To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Hi Alister
Having just tested the Sony PXW-180 I am in the market to buy myself a new camcorder to supplement my Sony PMW350 for working in news and documentaries. Which do you think I should go for, the PXW-180 which is not due out till later this year and still has to go through the EBU testing, or the Sony PMW 200, Which is better in low light. I’m wanting to part ex my Canon C100. Advice please, should I keep my Canon C100 (I use it with a Ninja 2 for 4:2:2 recording at Pro Res), or sell it and by one of the other two camcorders I have mentioned. In your opinion do you think the Sony PXW-180 would pass the EBU testing for T2 journalism.
Paul Walker 14/08/14