nanoflash and latency - workaround?

Discuss Solid state workflows and backups here.
Post Reply
harryllama@yahoo.com
Posts: 28
Joined: February 11th, 2011, 1:20 am
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

nanoflash and latency - workaround?

Post by harryllama@yahoo.com » February 12th, 2011, 7:05 am

Hello there,
I'm using nanoflash devices with my EX cameras (350 and EX-3). I run the HD-SDI cable from the cameras to the nano in, and then from the nano out to the monitors (Panasonic 17 in and Marshall 7 in). I guess it takes time to run the signal that far, because the monitor is usually a few frames behind the monitor on the camera! I think this is called latency. It's a bit disconcerting to see the picture delayed from the sound in the headphones from the camera. I suppose I could just audio monitor from the nano as well, but is there some setting in the camera or on the nano to adjust for this?

Harry
alisterchapman
Site Admin
Posts: 431
Joined: February 1st, 2011, 7:43 pm

Re: nanoflash and latency - workaround?

Post by alisterchapman » February 12th, 2011, 11:55 am

It's a processing delay through the system. The HDSDi out of the camera is about 1 frame behind the actual action, then there is another delay through the NanoFlash unless you select "E-E direct" in the NanoFlash menu.
harryllama@yahoo.com
Posts: 28
Joined: February 11th, 2011, 1:20 am
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

Re: nanoflash and latency - workaround?

Post by harryllama@yahoo.com » February 13th, 2011, 7:19 am

Thanks, Alister! I wondered what E-E direct meant! I'll give it a go next gig. One frame off should be a lot better.
alisterchapman
Site Admin
Posts: 431
Joined: February 1st, 2011, 7:43 pm

Re: nanoflash and latency - workaround?

Post by alisterchapman » February 13th, 2011, 9:22 pm

E to E bypasses any internal processing, thus reducing latency.
Post Reply