Some good news to come from Sony at IBC regarding the supply of professional media, Sony SxS and Optical Disc for XDCam are now back on track and the Sony authorised distributors have good stock. For those of you who are also using DVCam media all lines in this format are now in a free stock situation. I’ve also been told that HDCam and HDCam SR are now in end to end production and although quantities are low at the moment there should be an increase coming into suppliers within the next few months.

I spent most of my IBC on the Sony stand at what was unofficially known as the “ICE” bar, this had nothing to do with the famous Vodka serving Ice bar at the Red Square in Vegas (shame)! The ICE bar was manned by myself and other Sony Independent Certified Experts as well as Sony engineers and staff. We had most of the latest Alpha, NEX, NXCAM and XDCAM cameras but the best bit was that we also had a huge range of third party adapters, mounts, brackets and other widgets so that we could help and advise on different ways to get the most from your cameras. This was quite a departure for Sony as very often they will only show Sony products, but on the ICE bar we were able to talk freely about the myriad of different options that you have thanks to aftermarket updates and add ons.

The end result of this for me was an almost non stop queue of people eager to try different adapters, lenses or recorders on the fronts and backs of the F3 and FS100’s, so I got very little time to look around the vast show that IBC has become.

So what did catch my eye at IBC?

Starting on the Sony booth there was the new SCL-Z18x14 lens for the PMW-F3. This lens fits directly on to the FS mount and is not a PL mount lens. It is a 14x zoom giving a focal length range of 18 to 252mm, which for a Super 35mm camera is an incredible range. It is a servo zoom, operated by the F3’s zoom rocker and has auto iris, an optical image stabiliser and both full manual focus and autofocus via Sony’s familiar sliding focus ring system. The list price of around 9000 euros is very attractive, although you do need to consider that this is a T4 to T6.7 lens, so not very fast. However to put this into perspective an Angenieux Optimo 24-290 T2.8 will cost you in the region of 50,000 Euro’s and weighs a mighty 11kg (24lbs). One plus point for the Sony lens is that it does not breathe!

Of course instead of a PL mount or dedicated lens on the F3 you can always use a DSLR lens via an adapter. One of the stumbling blocks here has been that the iris on Canon lenses is controlled electronically by the camera, making them difficult to use on a non Canon body.

But not any more. Mike Tappa from MTF services has been working on this problem and we had one of his electronically controlled Canon adapters on the Sony booth. There are two parts to the system. A small electronic control box with internal batteries and the adapter itself. This means you can just get one control box and then buy the appropriate adapter ring to fit either a PMW-F3, the FS100 or Panasonic AF101. It’s not available just yet, Mike tells me it will be a couple of months with a target price of “less than 1000 euros”. I’m sure this will be a very popular product. The Birger adapter seems to have disappeared and it would seem that they are having issues getting it to work correctly, so Mike’s simple but highly effective approach is most welcome.

There were more and more booths showing camera rods, rails and camera mounts than ever this year so plenty to choose from there. We had a couple of nice Vocas rigs on the Sony booth that were sturdy and well made. Others worthy of a mention here are the new TLS Cineplates. Made for a variety of smaller cameras and including made to measure adapters for the F3 and FS100, these support brackets for 15mm rails are superbly designed and engineered and apart from anything else look fantastic. They are highly adjustable and the F3 version is designed to fit on the Arri 35mm bridge plate system that uses 19mm bars.

From Genus there is the recently introduced Elite Matte box designed for PL Mount and larger lenses. The Elite can take 4×4, 5×5 and 5.65×5.65 filters via innovative dual size filter holders. One way to support the Elite is a novel swing away adapter. This adapter is designed to work with Matte Boxes that are not already swing away. It mounts on the ends of a pair of 15mm rails and then the matte box support attaches to the adapter, the adapter itself can then be made to swing forwards with a clever double hinge allowing the matte box to swing forwards. This adapter can be fitted to a wide range of matte boxes, not just Genus ones. Of course you’ll need a 15mm rod system and genus have a new Uni-Plate universal base plate. This is really nice because as well as the usual front/back, up/down adjustments this also has a side to side adjustment with is useful for cameras with off centre mounting holes or off centre lens supports. Once you have your rails and rods in place then you’ll need something to mount all your accessories on and Genus now have both a 15mm and 19mm cheese plate kit.

The cheese plate mounts horizontally and vertically and has holes for most of the common battery adapter plates as well as a multitude of 1/4″ and 3/8″ threaded holes. Of course before I move on from Genus, I have to mention my Hurricane 3d rig. At IBC we were showing the latest updates including a new oversize hood for large PL mount lenses and the Canon XF105 as well as the motorisation upgrade kit.

This kit comprises of a bracket and drive gear that allows you to motorise the Interaxial adjustment using standard follow focus motors. Attached to the rig we had a prototype “Today 3D” 3D control system with wireless dual focus and IA control. With this kit fitted the Hurricane Rig becomes a real delight to use and allows the Stereographer to control the rig from the video village allowing the DoP or operator to shoot uninterrupted. IA control is accurate to within 1mm. Not shown at the show was a 3D monitoring solution for non-sync cameras costing less than 1000 euros but more on that another time.

So we have cameras, adapters and rod etc, but what about lenses? Well for the PMW-F3 you could always get a set of Zeiss, Cooke or Arri PL mount lenses. We all know that these are good, solid lenses but what about Schneider lenses?

Schneider are not new to this sector but they are now bringing in some very new lenses that were designed from the ground up to work with digital imagers as opposed to film. The Cine-Xenar II lenses are available with various mounts including Canon and PL mount. They are HD/2K/4K lenses with a telecentric optical design. The Telecentric design minimises breathing to the point where it’s barely noticeable (good for 3D) and ensures that the image projected on to the video sensor is flat, right out to the corners with virtually no vignetting. This means the image sharpness will be very even across the image giving a well focussed and even image. In addition the lenses typically have between 12 and 18 blade iris mechanisms for exceptionally beautiful Bokeh.

looking down into the lenses you can see the incredibly large amount of baffles used to reduce and control internal and external flare. One small quirk of these lenses is the way they focus. when you turn the focus ring the entire lens moves forwards and backwards, including the focus ring, so you will need a wide follow focus gear and a flexible donut or Nuns Knickers for you matte box. Although a little bit more expensive than some of the entry level PL mount lenses, Schneider claim that these lenses perform as well as some of the very best (and most expensive) lenses on the market so they may be an interesting option, I hope to get one or two to try out in the near future…  I’ll keep you posted!  One thing to consider is that purchasing a set of PL lenses is possibly a better long term purchase than a camera. Get a good set of lenses and they could last a life-time, almost certainly longer than most cameras. These lenses may be a great proposition as they are designed for flat, electronic sensors and they are good for 4k so they would even be a nice choice for the Sony F65.

Talking of the F65, I can’t not mention it here. The images from this camera still amaze me. They don’t necessarily look “sharp” but the level of small detail in the textures that you can see is incredible. Talking of incredible what about the price? 39,000 Euros for the body only or 75,000 Euro-ish for a full shooting kit is pretty good. Remember this is an 8K camera, recording 16bit RAW 4K.  Drool… drool…  just think of the flexibility you’ll have in post from that!

Another price to take me by surprise was the price of the Sony SR-R1. Now I have always associated HDCAM SR products as being expensive. I’ve never even considered actually buying or owning my own HDCAM SR kit, the price has always been similar to that of unobtainium, £40k and upwards. But the SR-R1 is solid state, so there is no need for a super precise mechanical deck with spinning drums etc. This makes it a much cheaper product to produce and as a result the price is much, much lower. In fact it’s actually quite affordable (for a top end piece of kit) with a UK street price of less than £14,000. It supports Dual Link, 3G and 3D recording onto SR Memory using the HDCAM SR codec at between 220 and 880Mbps. If you are shooting a low budget movie or commercials a PMW-F3 and SR-R1 has to be food for thought.

Of course for many, me included, £14k is still a lot to pay for a recorder, even if it is HDCAM SR. Now I have S-log on my F3’s I really need a decent 10 bit 4:4:4 recorder and the obvious fit is the Convergent Design Gemini. At IBC, Mike Schell of CD was proudly showing off working versions of the Gemini which is an ultra portable video recorder and monitor that can record single link 4:2:2 and both dual link and 3G 4:4:4 uncompressed video onto cost effective solid state hard drives as industry standard DPX files. Priced at around 4,900 Euros this is an amazing product considering it is both a recorder and HD monitor in a unit that fits into the palm of your hand and weighs very little. There will be future options for 3D and other uncompressed formats. Shipping is expected to commence in October, but not surprisingly there is a bit of a waiting list, so if you want one in a hurry you’d better get your name down soon.

While the Gemini does make a handy field monitor there is still a big need for small on camera monitors and viewfinders. Both Zacuto and Cineroid have had HDMI equipped electronic viewfinders on the market for some time. The early Cineroid units did have a few quality control issues and I have been assured that these have been addressed.

As I needed an EVF for use on my F3 rig I decided to pick up one of the new HDSDi versions of the Cineroid EVF at IBC. This has a very solid metal body and a much improved battery system. The screen is the same 800 x 480  as the older model, more resolution would be nice, but it works and I find I can focus with it very accurately using the peaking function. One nice point is that the lag seems much reduced compared to EVF’s using HDMI and this make using the viewfinder much easier. With my eyes starting to get a little older I’m finding a decent EVF with a bit of diopter adjustment more and more necessary and I am pleased with my new purchase. The clipping guide that shows you when the highlights are over exposed is particularly useful and pixel to pixel mapping can also be used for critical focus. Overall this unit feels very solid and should withstand the bumps and knocks it’s sure to get.

So now I have even more kit to power what should I use? I have not tried these yet but Pag’s new PagLink system sounds very clever. Have you ever had to set your alarm clock to get up in the middle of the night to swap batteries over on your charger as you don’t have enough channels to charge all your batteries? I know I have and it’s a real pain. The new PagLink system allows you to stack multiple batteries together, not just to get higher capacity or more power for shooting, but also to charge multiple batteries from a single V-Lock charger channel. In addition you can put a pair of batteries on the camera and hot swap the rear battery for continuous shooting. Check it out, it sounds very clever indeed.

Talking of stacking devices together, how about Atomos’s new “connect” mini converters. These tiny (really tiny) HDMI to HDSDI and HDSDI to HDMI converters are designed to clip on to the rear of existing devices that use Sony F series batteries. The converters themselves are powered by F series batteries and cost just a little over £200 GBP. But the cleverness doesn’t stop there because each connect device contains an internal battery that can power the device it’s connected to. So, slap a connect on the back of a Ninja and you can run it for a couple of hours and feed it from either HDM or HDSDi. Put a battery on the back of the connect and you can hot swap batteries while recording. In addition you can store test charts in a memory within the connect and it also doubles up as a flash light!!!! While talking about Atomos they are just about to release the Samurai which is the HDSDi version of the Ninja recorder. It has a bigger and better screen than the Ninja so it’s the unit is a  little bigger. Priced at 1145 Euros this really is a bargain for a 10 bit HDSDi recorder.

A few smaller notes.. The Sound Devices PIX240 will record 10 bit ProRes and DNxHD but it’s big and heavy. Nicely made but quite a weight to bolt on a camera and there is a big fan in the back of it. The KiPro Mini will get an upgrade to allow DNxHD recording in the coming months and Sony won an IABM award for their OLED monitor range. You really need to see OLED monitors in action to appreciate just how good they are.

So.. I’ve got a ton of work to do so can’t write any more now. It was great to meet so many of my readers at IBC.. Hello to all of you. I’m going to re-visit EX1 and EX3 picture profiles in the coming months as well as a whole series of S-Log tutorials. Catch up again soon.

Here’s a short video promoting the Convergent Design Gemini recorder. The reason I have posted it is because of the explanation of some of the differences between S-Log, RAW and standard gammas.

Not too many posts from me recently. Very busy, travelling all over the place, last week Hong Kong, this week Arizona. I’m in Arizona running a workshop for some students from Singapore Poly. We’re shooting some short video documentaries about the Arizona Monsoon thunderstorms. I’m also shooting lightning in HyperStereo with a pair of F3’s on a Hurricane 3D rig as well as some background footage with one of the new Sony NX-3D1E camcorders (brilliant little camera, review to follow). Last night we had some incredible storms and we are expecting more today.

Are we seeing the decline of the one de-facto 2/3″ shoulder mount camcorder? I think we are. The reasons are many fold, cost, and bulk are certainly factors, but what about sensor size, I think it depends on which sector you work in but historically larger sensors have been desireable

In movies and features the desire has always been to produce a film, even with a very low budget that has the look and feel of a big budget movie that would typically have been shot with a large sensor, so in the movie world little has changed, the desire for a large sensor has always been there, although often not at the top of the list of priorities.

However in factual, documentary, soaps and other television genres there was not the big desire for shallow DoF. I started in TV in the 80’s. I used to shoot on S16, then 2/3″ video cameras. This was normal for me and being honest it never even occurred to me that a bigger sensor might open up additional possibilities. As far as I was concerned it was a technology that was just not available for the kind of TV programmes that I worked on. Some of this was cost driven, smaller budgets simply meant the use of Super 16, Beta, DigiBeta and DVCAM and here in the UK at least this was normal and perhaps the biggest wish was just to have the budget for a better 2/3″ camera with a less electronic image.

Certainly I was aware of devices like the Pro35, Letus and other ground glass systems that could be used to allow the use of 35mm lenses on 2/3″ cameras, but they were just not practical for factual television. I did dabble with them on corporates, but frankly they were more trouble than they were worth.

Then along came video capable DSLR’s. Suddenly there was a perception that you could hand a $1500 camera to the DoP and hey-presto your documentary would look like a movie, your equipment and transportation costs would be slashed and you could shoot just about anywhere without being noticed. Now while most production companies realised that a DSLR would be a poor choice for many projects and had a whole bunch of new issues, the noise generated by the DSLR community was deafening. There have been some very beautiful looking, high profile (or at least highly vocal) productions shot with them and the shallow DoF, crushed blacks, high contrast look became quite fashionable amongst younger shooters, especially media students as a DSLR is very affordable compared to most full size cameras, you can pick up the Canon 550D (T2i) for £500. Because of the low cost of DSLR’s many of our universities and colleges will use then to teach video production. Yes they might have a couple of old HDCAM’s that the students might get a couple of hours on from time to time, but very often the day to day course work is done with either DSLR’s or handy cams.

So now we have a new generation of programme makers that own cameras that can produce something with that filmic shallow DoF and low frame rate progressive motion (DSLR’s don’t do interlace) that really don’t cost a lot of money. This is the look that these youngsters will be familiar with and to them a 2/3″ or half inch, off the shelf camcorder looks like video, while the DSLR’s look much more like film. With budgets in factual and TV in general getting squeezed more and more many of these younger shooters will find themselves out in the field as principle camera operators very early on in their career, possibly straight from college.

Now we have cameras like the F3, FS100 and AF101 that straddle and blur the boundary between DSLR style shooting and handy cam shooting. You have handy cam ergonomics with DSLR DoF. Because of the improved sensitivity you can shoot with these cameras at smaller apertures if you don’t want shallow DoF. The missing link is decent workable zoom lenses. Abel Cine’s 2/3″ adapters are certainly one way to go and I know that there are cheaper alternatives on the horizon. So conceivably you could have one camera that could be used for general purpose productions by using a 2/3″ lens plus adapter and shooting at f8. Then when you want the filmic look for more controlled situations you swap lenses and stick on a fast PL or DSLR lens.

In the future I envisage there being a range of compact “slow” f4  servo zooms specifically made for super 35. In effect all it would need is for Fuji or Canon to replace the 2x extender in the back of a 2/3″ HD lens with a 2.5x extender and the projected image will fill the s35 frame. Bolt on a PL mount and away you go. These lenses should cost no more than a current 2/3″ zoom, but they won’t be f1.8, now they will be f4 -f5.6.

So is 2/3″ going to hang around forever? I’m not convinced. You only have to look at the impact that lower cost 1/2″ and 1/3″ sensor cameras have had on the 2/3″ market. Single chip cameras will get better and better and the cost will almost always be lower as there is no expensive prism. Large sensor cameras with the right lens could be much more versatile than small sensor cameras. As the need for ultra fast lenses diminishes through improvements in sensor sensitivity, producing smaller, wide range zooms for s35 will become easier and cheaper, but then when shallow DoF is your goal you retain the flexibility to swap to fast primes or more exotic zooms. In the studio having larger lenses on s35 studio cameras would not really be a problem and a studio equipped with s35 cameras could one day shoot a game show and the next be used to shoot a filmic drama. For news 1/2″ and 1/3″ handycams are already becoming common place. For factual there is now a great desire to move from the video look to more of a film look, so s35 may be the way forwards. For Natural History, the 1/2″ EX3 is often used with DSLR lenses for long lens work. For sports you could argue that 1/2″ OB style cameras might make a lot of sense as producing compact long focal length lenses would be easier. If the cameras are smaller and lighter then the truck needed to transport them also gets smaller and lighter and each camera takes up less space in the stadium.

Clearly 2/3″ is not going to suddenly disappear, there is far too much already invested in it globally. But it’s share of the market in my opinion will only ever get smaller and smaller.