Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name |
Domain |
Purpose |
Expiry |
Type |
wpl_user_preference |
www.xdcam-user.com |
WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences |
1 year |
HTTP |
YSC |
youtube.com |
YouTube session cookie. |
54 years |
HTTP |
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name |
Domain |
Purpose |
Expiry |
Type |
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE |
youtube.com |
YouTube cookie. |
6 months |
HTTP |
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name |
Domain |
Purpose |
Expiry |
Type |
__utma |
xdcam-user.com |
Google Analytics long-term user and session tracking identifier. |
2 years |
HTTP |
__utmc |
xdcam-user.com |
Legacy Google Analytics short-term technical cookie used along with __utmb to determine new users sessions. |
54 years |
HTTP |
__utmz |
xdcam-user.com |
Google Analytics campaign and traffic source tracking cookie. |
6 months |
HTTP |
__utmt |
xdcam-user.com |
Google Analytics technical cookie used to throttle request rate. |
Session |
HTTP |
__utmb |
xdcam-user.com |
Google Analytics short-term functional cookie used to determine new users and sessions. |
Session |
HTTP |
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Name |
Domain |
Purpose |
Expiry |
Type |
__cf_bm |
onesignal.com |
Generic CloudFlare functional cookie. |
Session |
HTTP |
NID |
translate-pa.googleapis.com |
Google unique id for preferences. |
6 months |
HTTP |
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name |
Domain |
Purpose |
Expiry |
Type |
_ir |
api.pinterest.com |
--- |
Session |
--- |
So why the sony a6300 appears to be more “sensitive” than a sony fs5 ? Better electronics than fs5 ?
But the FS5 is more sensitive than the A6300. Remember, on an electronic camera ISO is not a sensitivity rating, it is an exposure rating. At a like for like exposure the A6300 is a lot noisier.
Thanks for your answer Alister, but what about that video around 5’10 (ok , I know it’s a youtube compression, but still…) :
That’s gain and amplification, that’s why it gets grainy and noisy. The picture does get brighter but you are not actually seeing any additional picture information in the shadows because it’s masked by the noise. A common mistake is to confuse a change of amplification with a real change in sensitivity. If you actually increase the sensitivity then more and more textures and fine details should come up out of the shadows and the noise should not significantly increase.
Thanks again, but if I look at the tree, it seems that is what happen with a6300 (more texture and detail) and not with the fs5…
Thanks Alister.
Could you explain why some of the ENG cameras with much smaller sensors, like the PMW-300, perform surprisingly well. Obviously not having the sensitivty of a A7s, but still performing well. Is it some kind of electronic fix with the lens and the cmos sensor?
They are HD sensors, not 4K, so a lot fewer pixels, so the pixels can be reasonably large, even though the sensors are small. They are normally around the equivalent of 300-350 ISO but usually have fast f1.8 lenses.
Some standard definition cameras are even more sensitive, again fewer, bigger pixels.
As you go up in resolution you need more pixels, so unless you make the sensor bigger, the pixels have to be smaller and the sensitivity reduces.
The laws of physics play a large part in all of this.
We start off with the light in our scene which passes through a lens.
If we take a zoom lens of a certain physical size, with a fixed size front element and as a result fixed light gathering ability, for example a typical 2/3″ ENG zoom. You have a certain amount of light coming in to the lens.
When the size of the image projected by the rear of the lens is small, you get an effective large aperture. Increase the size of the sensor and you have to increase the size of the projected image. This spreads what light you have “thinner” and as a result the projected image is dimmer, so the effective aperture is smaller and the DoF narrower. But, a bigger sensor can have bigger pixels and this makes up for dimmer image coming from the lens. So where a small sensor camera (1/2″, 2/3″) will typically have a f1.8 zoom lens when you scale up to a s35mm sensor the lens becomes the equivalent of f4 to f5.6. But because for like for like resolution the pixels size is much bigger the large sensor will be 2 to 3 stops more sensitive, so the low light performance is almost exactly the same and the DoF remains the same. Basically it’s all governed by how much light the lens can capture.
This is why using prime lenses that are much more efficient at capturing light has revolutionised low light shooting as the simplicity of a prime compared to a zoom makes fast lenses for large sensors affordable. Going the other way. If you were to take one of todays fast primes like a 50mm f1.4 and build an optical adapter of the “speedbooster” type so you could use it on a 1/2″ sensor you would have a lens the equivalent of a f0.5 6.5mm lens that would turn that 1/2″ camera into a great low light system with performance similar to an A7s with a 50mm f1.4.